Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Surtiska
Appearance
Surtiska was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was to delete the article.
- Is this notable? "Surtiska is used primarily by a small number of youngsters in Gothenburg, Sweden". Thue | talk 21:15, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- A dialect spoken by a few kids on one city doesn't sound important enough for documentation. Delete. [[User:Mo0|Mo0[talk]]] 21:34, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- It's used by over 100 people and understood by far more. keep! proxide :: talk 21:38, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- to us it's significant, and it's not like it takes up a huge space. and we are going to expand it occasionally too. Barhom :: talk 21:44, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Delete: Recreational dialect. Geogre 01:50, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Deletithen quijijan raten dialtectin ui ne fen persajenies speknik. --Slowking Man 08:45, Nov 12, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Not notable. --Improv 14:51, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Elf-friend 15:36, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Delete - Fennec (はさばくのきつね) 00:43, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Keep: might be interesting with time. -- Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 04:33, 2004 Nov 16 (UTC)
- Keep, for now. I'd give this one a chance to grow. --L33tminion | (talk) 05:21, Nov 16, 2004 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.