Talk:The Road to Serfdom
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
POV
[edit]I am quite disturbed by what I found here. If you have some valid criticism, cite it, but the wikipedia is not to have an editorial bias, especially not to the exclusion of needed info. [[User:Sam Spade|Sam Spade Arb Com election]] 12:18, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)
NPOV dispute
[edit]I'm going to be removing the header soon, unless someone objects. [[User:Sam Spade|Sam Spade Arb Com election]] 20:53, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Good idea. This is Hayek's book, so I don't see any problem in that this article describes his POV. Few wikilinks are good enough for opposing views, there is no need to duplicate material that exists in other socialism articles here. jni 07:16, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- [[User:Sam Spade|Sam Spade Wants you to vote!]] 10:51, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Cautions and clarifications
[edit]The first sentence of this section is editorializing and non-verifiable (i.e. whether Hayek is "clear" when read in full. Clear to whom?). I think it should be deleted.
Aside from the unnecessary part about when Hayek lived, the rest of the paragraph is non-verifiable (i.e. that the work is timeless) or editorializing (i.e. that readers need to read history first). I recommend the entire paragraph be deleted.
Overall the section reads like an apology for Hayek. The cited items seem relevant but I wonder if they could be included in a separate section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.120.140.241 (talk) 05:44, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
- I agree. I have gone ahead and done this. --Jaydavidmartin (talk) 01:57, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
Problems with the summary
[edit]Hayek discusses Johann Plenge but has not been mentioned in the summary? Leutha (talk) 15:42, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
Why is the title of the book translated into German in the opening paragraph?
[edit]Why is the title of the book translated into German in the opening paragraph? The book was written in English in the UK, and only later translated into German. Listing a foreign language title for a work usually reflects or denotes the language in which it was first written. If German, why not French or Italian or any other language? SteadyJames (talk) 07:25, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- C-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Arts
- C-Class vital articles in Arts
- C-Class Conservatism articles
- Mid-importance Conservatism articles
- WikiProject Conservatism articles
- C-Class Libertarianism articles
- High-importance Libertarianism articles
- C-Class Philosophy articles
- Mid-importance Philosophy articles
- C-Class philosophical literature articles
- Mid-importance philosophical literature articles
- Philosophical literature task force articles
- C-Class social and political philosophy articles
- Mid-importance social and political philosophy articles
- Social and political philosophy task force articles
- C-Class Contemporary philosophy articles
- Mid-importance Contemporary philosophy articles
- Contemporary philosophy task force articles
- B-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
- B-Class Book articles
- WikiProject Books articles
- C-Class Economics articles
- Mid-importance Economics articles
- WikiProject Economics articles
- C-Class politics articles
- Mid-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles