Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Ramon

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - deleted - SimonP 23:57, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC)

Alexander Ramon

Speedied twice, but should be here (unfortunately). Denni ☯ 01:32, 2005 Jun 2 (UTC)

Delete. Yeah, I guess it should be here (the second reincarnation had just enough context), but the outcome is inevitable. Obvious vanity, and all the more reason to expand the speedy criteria to include such articles. (Incidentally, Denni, I'm not sure how your nomination jives with your comment on the author's talk page. You may want to clarify.) AиDя01DTALKEMAIL 02:18, Jun 2, 2005 (UTC)
- You're right, Android. My advice to Datapencil was in error. Denni ☯ 00:40, 2005 Jun 3 (UTC)
Userfy if possible, otherwise delete --Xcali 06:05, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Delete Wiki is not an www.Name_directory. Non-notable. Fabartus 06:17, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Delete not notable, vanity, etc.... Tobycat 06:51, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Delete --File:Ottawa flag.png Spinboy 17:00, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Delete vanity -- JamesTeterenko 17:28, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I would normally have speedy userfied this, but he already has a User page, so I vote delete. Rick K 19:00, Jun 2, 2005 (UTC)
Delete or Userfiy. This belongs on a userpage. You 21:37, Jun 2, 2005 (UTC)
Userfy --Etacar11 23:46, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Userfy Sasquatch′↔Talk↔Contributions 04:42, Jun 3, 2005 (UTC)
I have Speedy Deleted this as a user test. User has a user page and this was an obvious test. - Tεx τ urε 18:23, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.