Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gadget
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
Old discussion from Votes for deletion
Discussion concluded and article kept on June 14, 2004
From Cleanup: Gadget - dict. def. (moved from Cleanup by SimonP)
- Delete. Johnleemk | Talk 15:15, 8 Jun 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. I see *potential* here. blankfaze | •�• 22:07, 8 Jun 2004 (UTC)
- Oh, I almost want to keep. What about a redirect to Widget? SWAdair | Talk 03:30, 9 Jun 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Has potential. (Don't redirect to gadget since widget really refers to an unspecified object.) Diberri | Talk 03:46, Jun 11, 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. A legitimate and genuine measure of technology. Without gadgets, WalMart and Radio Shack would not exist in their curent incarnations. Denni 00:02, 2004 Jun 12 (UTC)
- Gadget, widget, and thingamajig are very different in their semantic content. I have taken a substantial portion of gadget and moved it to a more appropriate location in thingamajig. Denni 01:12, 2004 Jun 12 (UTC)
- Keep. Kinda' interesting entry, although I doubt anyone would look it up for research. --Aaron Einstein 00:23, Jun 12, 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. "gadget" was the name for the first A-bomb. Ancheta Wis 04:14, 12 Jun 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Interesting, has potential. --Woggly 06:39, 13 Jun 2004 (UTC)