User talk:Cumbey

Banning threats

I have posted heavy evidences of SqueakBox fabrications and lies under the Solana page discussion. The proof is also there under SqueakBox's own entry on my own blogspot, www.cumbey.blogspot.com. I am asking that this be grounds for permanently banning SqueakBox from Wikipedia!

Writing in a blog won't get me temporarily banned. I do, though, still have support for an Rfc against her, and was urged not to abandon it. I believe you will not try to ban me. I certainly don't want to ban you, but you have no proof of anything untoward on my part, especially as Sharon did meet Solana on July 22, and your only proofs that he didn't were from articles before thast date. Wikipedia must not spread fgalsehoods as it is read by so many people, and these falsehoods get spread around. before you know it everyone is believing they never met last July. [1] --SqueakBox 16:22, May 13, 2005 (UTC)

SqueakBox versus Cumbey

Our case is being discussed here:Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Cumbey threatens SqueakBox. I brought it there under advice from another wiki user. SqueakBox 21:33, Mar 17, 2005 (UTC)

Mediation

I have taken you to mediation at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation. I advise you to co-operate; if not I will take you to Arbitration. Your baseless threats are making mne very angry. Go pick on someone else. --SqueakBox 20:24, Mar 14, 2005 (UTC)

I notice that SqueakBox continues to perpetuate slanderous lies that I am posting from Reston, Virginia. I have commented on this on my personal blogspot, www.cumbey.blogspot.com. He insists I have been there. I looked it up on mapquest today and see that it is where the Dulles Airport is located, so, good gravy, he is maybe, er, right. I was there ONCE, boarding a plane in 1984! That's it! SqueakBox must think I am ubiquitous. CEC

Totally untrue, Cumbey, as usual I might add. Someone signed CEC from Reston, Virginia. That is not me imputing. As usual you engage in persoonal; attacks. Are yiou incapable of manners. Please withdraw your comments. I am getting very tired of nasty aggressive people attacking me for my legitimate work at wikipedia stopping people using this encyclopedia to p[romote their political beliefs. Why not give up the anon contribs habit. All this mess is your fault. Don't you dare blame me. Stop spouting rubbish about slander and take some responsibility for your actions, SqueakBox 15:34, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)

Dear Squeakbox: I have been very polite to you compared to your incredible persistent rudeness and use of three different identities upon me. I have saved your entire string of correspondence, so have at it! If I recall correctly, you threatened me with a Honduran jail for "vandalising Wikipedia" when I was the one who wrote correctly. Moreover, I covered Solana's Spanish political career very thoroughly and you falsely accused me of not doing so. It seems my biggest mistake was once writing "Ferninand Gonazalez" instead of "Felipe Gonzalez" which would have been a simple edit for you. Instead, you launched an unseemly internet career of calling me "a troll" and a "vandal" among other things. Then you proceeded to ridicule what you perceive as my religious beliefs, while simultaneously confessing to me the past two days (if it wasn't one more blind) your faith in Haile Selassie, the long dead ruler of Ethiopia as God Almighty! If you want to talk patronizingly about religious beliefs, I could make one fine case out of that, but instead you want to rail and reduce Wikipedia to a Britannica Junior Encyclopedia and below. Why don't you go pick on someone else! CONSTANCE.

If youm leave me alone I will most certainly leave you alone. I have permanently retired from the Javier Solana article. User:Hierarchypedia is a real person. This would be very easy to prove. He is the creator of hierarchypedia and has written over 700 articles there. It is not credible that he and I are the same person. The only thing I want from you is that you leave me alone, both in and out of wikipedia. I have not threatened you with prison in Honduras, and would never expose you to even the possibility of that happening. If you agree to this write to me here or at User talk:SqueakBox (not via email) and I will cancel the mediation; which should not in any case as a threat. It is not arbitration, i.e. no-one tries to enforce anything, just mediate an agreement. --SqueakBox 03:41, Mar 16, 2005 (UTC)

BTW I most certainly was not ridiculing your belief- merely saying that I disagree with them. I have an absolute right to have and express religious beliefs, just the same as you do. The Rastafarian belief does not ridicule Christianity. It is an alternative and widespread belief that demands as much respect as Christianity. Just because I have a different set of religious beliefs about Biblical prophecy to the one's you hold does not mean I am ridiculising your beliefs. I have added alot of info about Rastafari in lots of religious articles here at Wikipedia, as well as adding a lot of material about Rastafarian doctrine to both Rastafarianism and Haile Selassie. So it is not for you to say whether or not I am a Rastafarian. --SqueakBox 04:02, Mar 16, 2005 (UTC)

THE LATEST

is that I advise uiser:cumbey to stop making personal threats against me and my family. --SqueakBox 17:01, Mar 14, 2005 (UTC)

This is CUMBEY. I see the good grammar, good punctuation entered this space as "Squeakbox" and corrected the grammar and typos of "David" the alleged Wiki Global Elite Sys Op. He has also continued to wreak havoc on that website which is independent of Wikimedia. He might as well know that I have plans to publish columns on various popular websites independent of either about these antics and tactics. SqueakBox/David, BEWARE THE IDES OF MARCH!

---

SOCKPUPPETS, SqueakBox,!

Talk about 'sockpuppets' - SqueakBox IS the below 'user David.' HE also is the person who represented himself to me on Gmail as He also is the person who writes well-written articles under the name and he write in full sentences, proper punctuation, and properly spelled words (unlike SqueakBox/David). He has committed deceit and a total fraud upon Wikipedia by using these tactics and then falsely accusing others of his tactic of using 'SOCKPUPPETS'

What are you ranting on about? David is User:hierarchypedia. he is a separtate user who does not have a Honduras IP address, as any sysop can confirm. Special:Contributions/hierarchypedia--SqueakBox 17:01, Mar 14, 2005 (UTC)

---

Wiki

Hello Constance. I am user David from the Solana fiansco on Global Elite wiki. I have been running my own wiki for 6 months now. It seems to be to your tastes. I would be greatftull for your contribution to it. The site is here. So far I have been the author of over 700 of the 842 articles we have at the moment. Almost all the others are contributions of a Wikipedia administrator. --Hierarchypedia 22:02, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)

I support what David is saying; hierarchypedia seems the place to put about Solana as the Beast theory; you can state exactly why you think he is the beast there. I don't think, on the other hand, that wikielite is the place to put forward such theories, any more than wikipedia is. It is clearly also the place where you can do original research. --SqueakBox 22:22, Mar 13, 2005 (UTC)

There is

a dangerous character lurking on Wikipedia. He calls himself 'Squeakbox'. He commits unthinkable acts of vandalism. Besides utterly ruining the Javier Solana article, he maliciously vandalized, this my own page. Then he went in unseemly manner to the Solana page and accused ME of vandalizing his page! He defied me to use my user name and then started a malicious and legally actionable campaign of imputing many, many user ID numbers to me. He is obviously afraid to use his real name. He has jumped in many times while I was writing, making me unable to finish my page without receiving a message that "somebody else started editing this page while you were editing . . ." He made demands to me on his page demanding I answer him there. When I attempted to do so, he cried like a little kid kicking somebody in the knees and then calling for his mommy! A real gentleman and scholar, he. Maybe that is the name his mother gave him!

SqueakBox responds

So you deny vandalising my user page here. Funny as iut was your account that did this? Please quote one source that I have ever vandalised wikipedia? Not using real names is standeard practice here. How dare you accuse me of of being afraid to use my real name. Learn how to deal with edit conflicts like the rest of us instead of whingeing because you can't be bothered to work the wiki technology, --SqueakBox 20:25, Apr 2, 2005 (UTC)

Cumbey

Squeakbox went over to Wiki Global Elite, an independent site using licensed Wiki Media technology and vandalized many pages, not only of myself, but erasing history pages, and then implying that an administrator there had done it and reporting on this board that his page had been locked in and the page composed by yours truly locked out. The administration of that board undid Squeakbox's damage and has locked the site from further unauthorized editing due to his vandalism! CONSTANCE E. CUMBEY cumbey@gmail.com

SqueakBox response

I did no vandalism at wikielite, unlike Cumbey, who did. I could not erase history pages, only an admin can do that. if cumbey had bothered to investigate she would have realised it was Maisie doing the deleting. Cumbey, on the other hand, lied to wikielite by claiming the wikipedia Solana article was hers, which of course it never has been, --SqueakBox 20:25, Apr 2, 2005 (UTC)

Cumbey

SqueakBox appears to be very much a sycophant for Javier Solana. He chops, he misspells, he uses poor grammar, and then to add insult to injury accuses those he abuses of his very acts. In psychological terms, it is called PROJECTION!" He claims on his page to have flunked logic. Now that, I could believe! User Cumbey.

SqueakBox

This is not your user page. This is your User Talk page. You did vandalise my user page, and someone else then reverted it because it was vandalism. i did not ruin the Solana article, i took the smell out of it. The smell of paranoid conspiracy theories. Conspiracy nuts are not welcome on this honourable project called Wikipedia. You reverted the Solana article to a factually inaccurate version after having been told it was factually inaccurate. The truth is Cumbey does not want the public to know that Solana is not the Devil, so she deliberately distorts and misrepresents Solana at every turn so that they can't get at the truth. I say the sooner we have a powerful EU the better. But I don't put this into my edits. If Honduras is the US patio they are doing a really bad job keeping it tidy. Honduras is floundering in poverty, and I am inclined to believe the Americans are responsible for this. --SqueakBox 04:20, Mar 11, 2005 (UTC)

Spanish plea

Qué pasa mujer? No entendé nada del idioma de Javier, a qué no? Y así porqué no lo dejá en paz, y a mí también. Usted no sabé nada de el, ni le importa menos la verdad. Todos tenemos nuestras preocupaciones sobre los poderosos del mundo; yo no tengo mucha confianza en Condoleeza Rice tampoco, pero no la arruino la página.--SqueakBox 04:14, Mar 11, 2005 (UTC)

Well, Squeabox, I read your 'rantings'/writings on end time theories with great interest. If you think those are funny, check out Findhorn, Plant Devas, Luciferic Initiations, Antahkaranas", Rainbow Bridges, etc., Doctrine of Avatars, and the whole plenitude of so publicly expressed New Age beliefs. Makes orthodox Christian doctrine look pretty tame, doesn't it, Squeakbox? Unfortunately, I don't have all day to sit at a computer and edit. I have to practice law for a living.

Constance E. Cumbey cumbey@gmail.com

Javier Solana

Cumbey, well I am glad we have one thing in common;dogs. I lost my 9 year old dog Boddhi 15 months ago, and it broke my heart. Even though in comparison Squeak and Box are untrained monsters Box is a very special being.

Are you aware that normally people who work here put their information on their user page, and keep the User talk page for discussion.

I have prejudices, as we all do, but I do not bring them into my work at wikipedia. I would urge you to read this about writing with a neutral viewpoint. Wikipedia is not a forum for people to express their opinions. It is an encyclopedia and therefore must remain impartial. Your changes to the Javier Solana article were obviously not coming from a neutral point of view, and have been reverted. Nobody cares re this article whether or not Solana is the Beast. It is a serious political article. If you want to document this 666 material you must do so at Number of the Beast (numerology) where they are interested in anything relating to the Beast and 666. Thanks for praying for me. Make sure it is a nice prayer. --SqueakBox 15:43, Mar 3, 2005 (UTC)

I have now put the document which I deleted, you reinserted and I redeleted from the Solana article into the Beast article. I have moved your bit about yourself to your User page User:Cumbey but if you don't want it there feel free to move it back here, or ask me to do so at User talk:SqueakBox. --SqueakBox 21:31, Mar 3, 2005 (UTC)

3RR

There is a possible 3RR violation heading your way. Please see and comment to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR. Thanks -- Chris 73 Talk 11:31, Mar 11, 2005 (UTC)

Cumbey threats

These threats were received by email. User:Cumbey claims SqueakBox is hacking into the wiki database. She is going to demand the hard discs from Jimbo Wales so she can get me put down for a long time because of my alleged hacking. She accuses me of having a stash of janja (sic) she means ganja, in my possession, and that she is going to tell the Honduran police about it. She is going to write to Jimbo demanding he reinstate her version of this article. She is very unhappy with the new contributors. She thinks they work for me and I work for Solana.--SqueakBox 14:42, Mar 14, 2005 (UTC)

Deductions

Your deduction skills would shame a not very bright 10 year old. I am very unhappy at your slurring of my character based on frankly illogical and stupid deductions.

The reason I told you what was going on at wikielite is because I was watching it on my own computer. You, sharing my ability to see the internet through your own computer, were able to see the same thing as me, hence my saying "take a look". How from that you conclude I hacked into the database is frankly bizarre. Equally bizarre has been your assertion that I and User:Hierarchypedia are the same person. Your reasoning? We both write with a similar style. What you actually mean is we are both English. In the UK we get taught to write, spell, punctuate, etc, in British English, not the American variety. Your great proof that David is my sockpuppet is based on the fact that we both use a different type of English to you. Which is a truly cranky surmise. (Incidentally the Honduras this Week articles were written in American English, which is why according to you I miraculously knew how to spell and punctuate there). This is a further example of your bitterly anti English, anti European view. Why don't you leave me and my country alone? and stop lying (at talk:Jimbo Wales, about not wanting the hard copy, and not knowing I had a partner)? and stop making unfounded allegations? (the above 2) You think Selassie is dead? Well I think Jesus died 2000 years ago; that does not mean I am insulting your religion, which you seem to believe is more valuable than mine. Not only Jesus but those who fled to the USA from Europe escaping religious persecution would turn over in their grave hearing of your persecutory antics against Rastafarianism. Religious persecution is unacceptable. Don't you dare blame me for your religious persecution of me. You are NOT the only one with thee right to religious freedom without fear of persecution. I was going to drop mediation, but you letter to Jimbo has made me change my mind. --SqueakBox 16:23, Mar 25, 2005 (UTC)

I also want to remind you that if you were to mention my work at wikipedia in your latest book it would be perfect grounds to get you banned from wikipedia; take care of wikipedia's reputation, and mine in terms of my work here, in any publications of yours. --SqueakBox 18:01, Mar 25, 2005 (UTC)

Privacy of emails

If I remember rightly it was you who broke the privacy of our email conversation when you published my name. ad the cheek to blame me at User talk:Jimbo Wales. Please get your facts right, --SqueakBox 19:06, Apr 2, 2005 (UTC)

Your latest edits

In my opinion They also note with interest the extraordinary work by anti-Christians (i.e. Haile Selassie as God followers) on some prominent internet resources to erase what they consider evidences that 'fundamentalist Christians', written by you, is no more than a veiled personal attack against me in the article itself. Will you please source your claim that Rastafarians have the slightest interest in the claim that Solana is the Beast, and failing that will you never put anything about Selassie or his followers in the Solana article. In my opinion if you do it again it should be treatted and reported as vandalism. Using this wonderful encyclopedia to make your point is absolutely beyond the pale. The reality is that I am doing my best to give a balanced and informative article abouit Solana in the face of personal harrassment by you. I note you agrees with me about the 10 horn prophecy, ie that you were placing your originakl thesis in the article. Original theses are not allowed in wikipedia. Go write somewhere else, stop trashing wikipedia, it deserves better, --SqueakBox 16:32, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)

Your Selassie edit

[2] was a vandalism as well as personal attack against me. See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Cumbey or 68.61.150.80. Vandalising wikipedia will not help your cause here. Please don't do it again, --SqueakBox 14:51, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC)

Rfc

take a look at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Cumbey, --SqueakBox 19:12, Apr 13, 2005 (UTC)

You have been blocked

You have been blocked for 24 hours for violating the policies establised at Wikipedia:No personal attacks and Wikipedia:No legal threats, specifically with reference to the following paragraph from Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Cumbey (emphasis added):

SqueakBox is, like all cowards, hiding under a pseudonym . . . There is one thing that SqueakBox published that is utter defamatory and it is a promise, not a threat that I will take legal action UNLESS IT IS IMMEDIATELY REMOVED.

That you construe your assertion that legal action will be taken as a "promise" rather than a "threat" does not exempt it from the rules enumerated on the page about legal threats.

You should also consider refraining from angry rhetoric. Most Wikipedia users can identify angry rhetoric when they see it, especially administrators and members of the Arbitration Committee; they tend to hold such material in low regard and may disregard it or form negative opinions against the person who posts it, regardless of the presence or absence of legitimate concerns. Ultimately, it does not help your cause.

Thank you for your attention in this regard. You will be blocked again if you continue to violate Wikipedia policies. -Fennec (はさばくのきつね) 05:18, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Fame at last

Take a look at Constance E. Cumbey. Note that I didn't start it, --SqueakBox 21:31, Apr 16, 2005 (UTC)

Please don't insert my user name in the text of articles which i am not connected to. it ruins the accuracy of the text, and could be considered vandalism, especially if you keep doing it, --SqueakBox 02:17, Apr 17, 2005 (UTC)

Sockpuppet

I am not sure if this is still in the "grapevine" that I am SqueakBox. I would like to point out that there isn't any overlap with hierarchypedia.com and SqueakBox's wikipedia edits and I don't understand why you think I am him. --Hierarchypedia 18:01, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)

PS - the site has had quite a few hits from this page :P

So very sorry, I don't believe you! Hierarchypedia/SqueakBox/David -- all SqueakBox sockpuppets as far as I am concerned!

Reply

Since Terry of ConspiracyArchive.com, who seems to be a friend of yours has verified that I am not SqueakBox can we not put an end to this fiasco? You can read on SqueakBox's user talk that I have tried to stay out of this. I do appoligiese for calling you crazy, but this was because i have no idea why you have been saying me and him are the same person, and you have also been calling me wicked etc and claiming i made threats at global elite and database hacking. Also did you vandalise Hierarchypedia shortly after SqueakBox uploaded the Solana article? Since I have seen you say he loves the pot before I suspect it is you.

Coincidently I do not agree with SqueakBox, as I don't like Solana.

Also if SqueakBox has been attacking you and commiting acts of vandalism, you should document it and report it like he did with you. As there is a full history this should be easy. However I have never seen or been directed to any threats of vandalism by SqueakBox. If there is any, as you claim I would like to see it.

You could even have an admin verify that I live in England\Wales. --Hierarchypedia 12:31, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Hierarchypedia/David does indeed live in the United Kingdom. I've had enough dealings with him to know. Anyway, I'd like you (and the people arguing with you) to know that edit warring is considered a breach of Wikiquette and is of borderline acceptability. Personal attacks are over the line. Accusing someone (without admissible evidence) of sockpuppetry comes very close to that, and I request that you stop. David Cannon (administrator) 01:54, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

Hacking allegations

I hope you accept Maisie's explanation here that I did not hack in to Wiki Global Elite, nor did anyone else. Can you please retract your statements to the effect that I did (eg at User talk:Jimbo Wales#Cumbey reply to 'SqueakBox' Allegations and anywhere else, --SqueakBox 03:08, Apr 27, 2005 (UTC)

Rfc

I have withdrawn the Rfc against you. Please withdraw your hacking allegations, now you know them to be false. Feel free to debate any changes to Javier Solana on it's talk page, --SqueakBox 20:06, Apr 27, 2005 (UTC)

Sockpuppets

Davidcannon apologised to me about his absurd sockpuppet claims. I have asked him to apologise to you as well. I have never used a sockpuppet at wikipedia, and I firmly believe you haven't either. I edited your user page in good faith as you had placed a statement obviously meant there on your talk page. you won't resolve disputes with me at wikipedia with a combative style, but by making the peace as I am trying to do, --SqueakBox 16:30, May 18, 2005 (UTC)

Noone believes Solana is some kind of saviour, least of all me, nor could I care less about relating him to Biblical prophecy. I am interested in the political aspects of his career, and in that aspect getting rid of your anti European pro US point of view was completely justified. How can you compare yourself to the Jews who were persecuted in thirties Germany. Nobody is treating you or your followers in that fashion - yellow stars, concentration camps, death. Once again you seem determined to trivialise the Nazi crimes against the Jews. Have you looked at Talk:Javier Solana lately? I have argued that putting Recommendation 666 in the article would be censorship. Censorship is not only about deleting material, it is also when governments or others force someone to include something that they wouldn't otherwise, SqueakBox 16:22, Jun 3, 2005 (UTC)

Attacks

Let him who is without sin cast the first stone. I no more have dyslexia than you do, and accusing me of doing so makes you appear nutty, SqueakBox 16:01, Jun 26, 2005 (UTC)

I have removed the personal attack you made against me on your user page in which you mentioned me 12 times. Please stop obsessing, and don't mention me on your user page again, SqueakBox 16:09, August 7, 2005 (UTC)

This is odd

Currently, the site " http://www.blue-blood.co.uk " redirects to your Userpage. Do you have any idea what that is? --Mr. Billion 19:09, 7 October 2005 (UTC)

Your edit comment

Nothing to do with me. Please be civil and check what you say isnt't rubbish, SqueakBox 01:57, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

And welcome back! SqueakBox 02:08, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Latest edit

You have been contributing over 2 years now so please take some time to learn to use the wikipedia, as it is I have to chase after your edits correcting them simply because you are being sloppy again and again and again. You are not a newbie so really there is no excuse, SqueakBox 19:03, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Alice Bailey

You are being talked about at Talk:Alice Bailey#Constance Cumbey and Talk:Alice Bailey#Cumbey becomes incumbent, SqueakBox 19:49, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Links

Here is a site that best describes you. [fans.frankbutcher.net] 163.41.138.2 (talk) 18:11, 3 January 2008 (UTC)