User talk:Tbackstr

Hey visitor! I'm kind of out of the loop, logging on to Wikipedia sparsely (altough using it frequently), so don't expect any rapid answers... :) --Tbackstr (talk) 08:42, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! -- Graham ☺ | Talk 15:09, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Uh, after almost four years on Wikipedia I'm not exactly a newbie. Or are you implying that I should read those (again)? I've tried to be polite even when I've been sometimes confused. Well, perhapse I'll just assume that you've somehow taken me for somebody else. --Tbackstr 17:59, Dec 20, 2004 (UTC)

Well I've never had anyone take it like that before. When scanning Recent Changes (for vandalism, newbie tests, that kind of thing) if I see someone who has a username that doesn't have a discussion page attached to it my automatic assumption is that they are fairly new and being the overly nice person that I am I drop in and leave them a message. And 99.9% of the time I am correct in assuming that person to be fairly new to wikipedia, and if you scan my user talk archive you'll see lots of people commenting on how helpful they found the message. Please don't read any offense into my actions, and please assume best intentions because I can assure you if I thought you were doing something wrong I would tell you: I don't believe in hiding behind snide remarks and sarcasm. -- Graham ☺ | Talk 13:58, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Main namespace cleanup

In an effort to clean up the main namespace, I've moved your old main namespace userpage to User:Tbackstr/old, as there's some edit history you might want to keep. Otherwise just delete it. --fvw * 12:28, 2004 Dec 31 (UTC)

Copied Work

Hey, dude. I just wanted to suggest, with response to your contributions to Levinson recursion, that you not copy academic papers verbatim -- even if they are your own.

The problem is that I had actually read the relevant part of your dissertation before I had stumbled across this Wikipedia article, and it left me with a ton of fuss and effort before I found out that the "plagiarized" dissertation material was, in fact, your own work from your dissertation. Also, in the future, please cite your sources. If you had at least cited your own dissertation in this regard, it would have meant a lot less hassle to find your dissertation again to verify whether or not the info was, in fact, copied verbatim; and if so, who copied it verbatim. It would have also been nice if you had included the cited sources from your dissertation, because, y'know, you had them right there at the time.

Thanks for hearing me out, Drostie 22:42, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comment. I'll try not to do that again. --Tbackstr 08:02, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion

Seeing as how you were involved w/ the Phoniatrics article, I thought you might be interested in the current merge discussion. Please join the discussion at Talk:Speech therapy.

-RJ1001 04:32, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

discrete hilbert transform

Hi, was just trying to prove the statement about discrete hilbert transforms given on the Hilbert_transform page. I noticed you originally added the discrete section, and so i was wondering if you could give me some reference? thank you very much! /Marmelad 17:56, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page

I found your old user page while checking out some old deleted contributions. I have history merged it, so that all edits are in one place. Hope you don't mind. Graham87 12:03, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article "Choir"

Hi T! What's up? I'm about to finish editing of the choir article from en: wikipedia, but I'm still a little bit dubious about some parts. I checked the contributors and found you as the starter of the article. Here is that question:

Although many contemporary churches have replaced the choir with singers, some churches have choirs which are backing vocalists in contrary to front line singers, which are in the Alto, Soprano and Tenor range for both Males and Females.

Does it mean except for "Solo" singers, there's a choir also? Are front line singers the "solos"? After the phrase "in contrary..." I don't get it completely. Would you help me on this please?

Lots of thanks; Princilll (talk) 17:54, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Tbackstr. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Tbackstr. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join the Fifteen Year Society

Dear Tbackstr,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more.

Best regards, Urhixidur (talk) 19:48, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	I gave it specifically for "basis directions along which matrix multiplication is equivalent to scalar multiplication". Miladkiaee (talk) 09:52, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]