Talk:Studley, Warwickshire

Warwickshire Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Warwickshire, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Warwickshire. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Please also feel free to join in the discussions on the project's talk page.WarwickshireWikipedia:WikiProject WarwickshireTemplate:WikiProject WarwickshireWikiProject Warwickshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for deletion on 9 June 2004. The result of Studley was keep.

VfD June 2004

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

From VfD

Studley

What is this? I thought London was the largest. --Merovingian ↕ T@Lk 18:28, Jun 9, 2004 (UTC)

It might be a question of legal distinctions--London might be classified as a city while this is the largest legal village, or something of that sort. No vote. Meelar 18:40, 9 Jun 2004 (UTC)
- Perhaps move to cleanup? --Merovingian ↕ T@Lk 18:45, Jun 9, 2004 (UTC)
Keep, list on Cleanup. Rick K 21:13, Jun 9, 2004 (UTC)
Ummm... rubbish. How do you know wht's a village and what isn't? The Land 18:02, 11 Jun 2004 (UTC)
- Because, in general, the location is registered as such with whatever government agency oversees such things. Presumably Studley has the largest population in the UK of all population centres classified as villages. Either way, it's a real place, people live there, etc, so keep. Rhymeless 03:17, 12 Jun 2004 (UTC)

end moved discussion

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Comments

I thought Kidlington was the largest village in the UK; this website: [1] seems to confirm this. Ianb 20:09, 20 Jun 2004 (UTC)

A suggestion as to the origin of the name 'Studley' would be worthwhile. Anyone have any ideas ? Cabinscooter 06:56, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In the Doomsday Book it was called Studleigh. The "Stud" refers to the fact that the local industry was horse breeding. "Leigh" is an old English word for field. "Studleigh" is pronounced "Studley" and over time the spelling evolved to what we have today. Kelpin 17:52, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps it should be called 'Publey'? Cabinscooter 06:58, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

US Studley information removed

I've just removed some information from this page, as it seems to relate to a different Studley, in the US rather than the UK, and was poorly formatted.

Perhaps a Studley disambiguation page is needed? Indreamix 11:55, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved and not moved, respectively. --BDD (talk) 16:41, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Studley → Studley, Warwickshire
[[:Studley, Inc.]] → Studley

– With three towns in England named Studley, Studley should not be a primary term with respect to usage as it is not highly likely than all other topics combined to be the topic sought when a reader searches that term. If Studley is to have a primary topic, it should Studley, Inc. as the company ranks second for the term Studley on Google in the UK according to [2]. Additionally, the company appears at the top of Google Books search results and boasts a book by the company's founder as well. Studley, Inc. also is represented in Google News frequently and as I write this sits atop the Google News search results. The company has also been featured in many major publications, most recently in the New York Times and Bloomberg. Lastly, Studley, Inc. makes up the vast majority of search results on Google for the term Studley in the US. RyLaughlin (talk) 17:53, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose/Support Support moving Warwickshire, Oppose moving the company. Instead a disambiguation page should be situated at the main location. Google shows no dominance of the company [3] , indeed, I can hardly find more than a couple of hits on the list. As for Warwickshire, there seems to be other places/companies/etc called Studley that drown it out as well. Are you assuming that any company called "Studley" is part of Studley Inc or something? This is clearly not the case. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 00:47, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose move of Studley, Inc. → Studley, but support move of Studley → Studley, Warwickshire and Studley (disambiguation) → Studley as there is no evidence of a primary topic. Zarcadia (talk) 16:26, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose/Support - exactly as 76.65.128.222 and Zarcadia, Support moving Studley Warwickshire, Oppose moving the company. Move disambiguation page to the main location. Same reasons. In ictu oculi (talk) 17:14, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Above move

The above move nomination is slightly flawed - there are no English towns, they are Studley (large village and civil parish) and Studley (small village) and a hamlet (article section) Studley. Agree with outcome but representing them as somewhat equal when not doesn't aid disambiguation, especially when done by User:RyLaughlin (a WP:SPA / WP:COI editor) promoting a business. Thank you, but this attempt is transparently business promotion. Widefox; talk 20:01, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]