Talk:Cross of Valour (Australia)

Orders, decorations, and medals C‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of orders, decorations, and medals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Orders, decorations, and medalsWikipedia:WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medalsTemplate:WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medalsOrders, decorations, and medals articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Cross of Valour (Australia) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Numismatics Mid‑importance

	Numismatics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numismatics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of numismatics and currencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NumismaticsWikipedia:WikiProject NumismaticsTemplate:WikiProject Numismaticsnumismatic articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

GC

When did it replace the GC in Australia, because the most recent living civilian award the GC was to Constable Michael Kenneth Pratt of the Victoria Police, Melbourne, Australia for arresting two armed bank robbers (London Gazette, July 5, 1978). Philip Baird Shearer 22:03, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)

See my quote below which includes a brief description of the bravery of Mr Michael Pratt GC. Mr Pratt's award was approved by the Queen within her own gift. Here's what the official Australian web page states:

Imperial Awards
Prior to 1975 Australians were recognised through the British Imperial system. Medals awarded to Australians included the Order of the British Empire, military decorations for gallantry, decorations for military service and campaign and long service medals. By 1991 Australian honours and awards were available to recognise all service previously recognised through the British Imperial system. The Queen can still recognise Australians through the British Imperial system within her own gift.[1]

1) http://www.itsanhonour.gov.au/honours/awards/imperial.cfm

101.162.226.77 (talk) 05:20, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:CVAustRibbon.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:CVAustRibbon.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:CVAustRibbon.png)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:39, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Correct first-time use of post-nominal

On the first occurrence of the last name of the recipient in the text of an encyclopaedic article about an award granted to a person or persons, the relevant post-nominal should be stated. This is even though, obviously, at the time of his or her action, the person had not yet been recognised officially for his or her bravery. An example of this correct use (with my emboldening), taken from the official Australian web page, is:

Between 1940 and 1978, when the last George Cross awarded to an Australian was presented, 14 Crosses were awarded, five of this total going to civilians. This total does not include substitutions of the George Cross for the Albert Medal and the Edward Medal carried out in 1971. An Australian civilian who received the George Cross was Mr Michael Pratt GC. He was a constable in the Victoria Police Force who was not on duty and was not armed, and who was wounded attempting to arrest armed robbers. The Queen approved his award for outstanding bravery, devotion to duty and complete disregard for his safety, in attempting to arrest the robbers. Mr Pratt’s citation was published in a Supplement to The London Gazette of Monday, 3rd July 1978 - PDF 47KB [1,2]

1) http://www.itsanhonour.gov.au/honours/awards/imperial.cfm#gc
2) http://www.itsanhonour.gov.au/honours/awards/docs/london_gazette_04071978.pdf
101.162.226.77 (talk) 05:08, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cross of Valour (Australia). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091105163654/http://www.forbravery.org/crossvalour.html to http://www.forbravery.org/crossvalour.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:23, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]