Talk:Kennington

London Mid‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

boundaries

Is it convenient to equate Kennington with Prince's and Oval wards? See http://www.lambeth.gov.uk/NR/rdonlyres/BC2414A7-6E9C-4BE7-BFB9-29181615D4D0/0/wardmap_2002.gif —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.189.103.145 (talk) 09:28, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. This article is an example of bad local history, where because the writer(s) don't have enough information or knowledge about the area in question they lump in other neighbourhoods to bolster it all. The truse demarcation between 'Kennington' and other areas eg neighbouring manors or parishes is its boundaries. There is NO Kennington area in Southwark, it does not matter that because the road is called 'Kennington Park Road' it some includes all of that area, the road is in part a boundary with Newington. I shall alter those references. Tony S 212.139.233.11 (talk) 21:09, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

dialling code

There's no such code as 02077 nor does Kennington cover it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.189.103.145 (talk) 21:06, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed - and removed. Tony S 212.139.238.3 (talk) 21:44, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

where it is

Wouldn't it make sense to say that Kennington was only in Lambeth? It's hard to see which bits of Southwark's Cathedrals ward are in Kennington. The population-figure is for Princes and Oval and this makes sense. Vassal-ward is in Stockwell. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.189.103.145 (talk) 21:11, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed - but not all of Lambeth is in 'Kennington'; the originator(s) avoid defining it so as to lump in neighbouring areas because they had little to say about it. Aside from chunks of Newington/ Walworth in Southwark eg Imperial War Museum, St George's Fields and West Square; they have also 'adopted' into their self defined 'Kennington' parts which are properly Vauxhall and north Lambeth parish eg Waterloo Station etc. This is just bad local history. Tony S212.139.238.3 (talk) 21:49, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Kennington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive {newarchive} to http://vangoghletters.org/vg/letters/let092/letter.html;

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:15, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kennington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120316220346/http://www.lambeth.gov.uk/Services/AboutLambeth/LambethByLocalArea/NorthLambethHistory.htm to http://www.lambeth.gov.uk/Services/AboutLambeth/LambethByLocalArea/NorthLambethHistory.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:10, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 18 January 2017

This edit request to Harlem Spartans has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

MazzaE7 (talk) 21:18, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: According to the page's protection level you should be able to edit the page yourself. If you seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. EvergreenFir (talk) 23:00, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kennington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071030192829/http://www.gwp.enta.net/surrnames.htm to http://www.gwp.enta.net/surrnames.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:17, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]