Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esata
Esata was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was
A constructed language. [[User:Poccil|Peter O. (Talk)]] 17:52, Oct 22, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete: Brand new, a simplification, not spoken. Geogre 19:05, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Wikipedia is not the place to promote your latest auxlang proposal. — Gwalla | Talk 23:47, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Indrian 23:48, Oct 22, 2004 (UTC)
- Keep The new page does not infringe any rules according to the deletion policy. This is a valid proposal for an auxilliary language, an area for which there is growing interest. The proposal outlines one of the easiest to learn personal languages with many interesting features. There are numerous other auxlang proposals mentioned already in wikipedia. Why not wait and see if the page gets any traffic? Pafu 11:48, Oct 24, 2004 (UTC)
- Notability is not a rule, it's the Prime Directive. I believe interest is increasing, since both world population and literacy are increasing. I also believe that their visibility has increased, due to being freed of the disadvantages that non-Internet publishing imposes on impractical ideas. None of these indicates increase in notability, let alone achievement of encyclopedic notability. --Jerzy(t) 02:14, 2004 Oct 27 (UTC)
- Delete. May be notable someday, not yet. --Improv 17:21, 24 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. It needs to be more notable. NeoJustin 05:26 Oct 25, 2004 (UTC)
- Del. Not notable. --Jerzy(t) 02:14, 2004 Oct 27 (UTC)
- Delete: Wikipedia is a place to document existing phenomena, not original research; there are other, more suitable, places to take proposals for new languages: see Constructed language#Communities for example. --Phil | Talk 15:43, Oct 27, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete V-v-v-vanity Ashibaka ✎ 21:20, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.