Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chromabarography
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Rossami (talk) 05:21, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Page is currently a copyvio, I want to make sure it doesn't come back. Chromobarography is not currently a field of chromotography, the user that posted this article seems to have some role in the development/promotion of this unused technology (hoax?), and has tried to stick the details into the chromotography article too.--nixie 00:54, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- 592 google results, 273 yahoo results. Not noteworthy yet. Delete due to copyvio -- Tygar 03:19, Mar 4, 2005 (UTC)
- 133 actual [Google results]; most seem to be by the "inventor". No hits on PubMed, implying no significant peer-reviewed publications refer to this technique. Delete.
- Above submission by TenOfAllTrades. Only 133? Still. Wow. Tygar 06:10, Mar 4, 2005 (UTC)
- 133 actual [Google results]; most seem to be by the "inventor". No hits on PubMed, implying no significant peer-reviewed publications refer to this technique. Delete.
- Delete — I smell snake oil. Is there any independent confirmation of all these seemingly self-promotional information links? — RJH 18:53, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Nomination blanked by anon user:212.38.111.226. Restored (without the "original research" pastel box). Rossami (talk) 23:32, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete this red-headed step-child of the Perpetual Motion Machine. Edeans 21:04, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.