User talk:Irate~enwiki

Policy

Any comments by my accuser will be removed as vandalism.--Jirate 16:05, 2005 Apr 10 (UTC)

Current list of know vandals. User:Smoddy, User:Matt Crypto

User:Zanimum

Has been vandlising by MetaWiki talk page.--Jirate 11:20, 24 July 2005 (UTC)

User:Violetriga

Hi Irate. Please do not modify other users' user pages. It is not allowed. The line that you removed was perfectly within policy. While I was more than happy to welcome you back, your return has been distinctly lacking in auspicity thus far. Cheers, [[smoddy]] 12:22, 24 July 2005 (UTC)

If it's against the rules then stop User:Zanimum altering min on WikiMedia. Until then it is fair game. I don't realy care about you opinion.--Jirate 12:24, 24 July 2005 (UTC)

User:Theresa Knott

What a suprise I put in aRfC against Terrsa Knot and what happens she deletes it and blocks me. Typical admin action. This woman should be banned.--Jirate 15:06, 24 July 2005 (UTC)

Now going around bosting about it. Irate is currently on an 24 hour block for edit warring over where his comments should go on this page Theresa Knott (a tenth stroke) 15:14, 24 July 2005 (UTC) You not she still continues the fiction that I undid here contxt destroying edit. I did not. I was putting in an RFC against Knott. See [[1]]

--Jirate 15:18, 24 July 2005 (UTC)

Just confirming what I said in my latest email. As soon as you calm down and agree to stop with the bad faiths rfcs etc I will unblock you. Theresa Knott (a tenth stroke) 16:05, 24 July 2005 (UTC)

They are not bad faith. I beleive you hand others have broken the rules. Now stop hassling me, restore my RFC and reenable me.--Jirate 16:24, 24 July 2005 (UTC)

You still have not restored my editing and so continue to break the rules inorder to stop an RfC being started against you. Any vote by you against me is simply you abusing you position. You have attacked me by blocking me. You prevent me from starting an RFC against you. You should resign you admin ship immediatly it is not supposed to be used be people for there own ends. Anyone who places a link on a page inorder to check up on me is engaged in personal abuse. The problem is you don't like beingkept with in your rules.--Jirate 18:33, 24 July 2005 (UTC)

Oh, look, stop being so ridiculous. The 3 RfCs and the RfAr you started today were all utterly frivolous, as you well know. Let's be frank: you are about to be put in a position where admins can block you summarily for anything they judge to be a personal attack. You're not stupid, so I'm sure you appreciate that this means you face a simple choice. Either you A) continue to antagonise others as you have been doing today, and get blocked; or B) stop the personal attacks and stop firing off spurious RfC / RfArs, and be allowed to edit here. The choice is yours to make, but I'm sure we would all much rather not spend our time chasing around after you, and would infinitely prefer it if we could just get back to the simple joys of quietly editing encyclopedia articles. How about you make that possible, eh? — Matt Crypto 00:30, 25 July 2005 (UTC)

Well I'd appreciate it if you'd with draw you provoctive lists. It is people who choose to chase after me, example being your watchlist.--Jirate 00:38, 25 July 2005 (UTC)

I've deleted User:Matt Crypto/list. — Matt Crypto 00:42, 25 July 2005 (UTC)

I will attempt to more subtle in future.--Jirate 01:09, 25 July 2005 (UTC)

People who need to be watched

Thing2 Still up to your old tricks hey Gerard. Protecting your mates. You personal attacks against me will be removed as soon as I am back online. as will ve VileTriga and the others.

DavidGerard go away, you gibbering fuckwit. Wikipedia is not chlorpromazine.

Thing2 I a gibbering fuckwqit hey. COmpared with you I am a genius.

Thing2 Though of course being as lacking in integrity as you. I imagine you clam to be one.

Thing2 So do you refuse to remove your attacks?

Thing2 This is of course going in my RFC apparently I have to have tried to resolve the problem, but obviosly you don't want to be solved.

Thing2 Wikipedia also isn't a bigger dick.

Thing2 You realy are unplasant aren't you. That little lot will be going in the log as well.

DavidGerard argh. how does one set a mask to /ignore an IP range?

Denelson83_IPA I don't think that's possible

DavidGerard irate is hopping around on dhcp being a PITA

Project2501a Dave2: it's not possible.

ambi2 DavidGerard: have them k-lined?

=-= Mode #wikipedia +b *!*Thing2@*.range217-44.btcentralplus.com by DavidGerard

=-= YOU (Thing2) have been booted from #wikipedia by DavidGerard (DavidGerard)

Thing2 I'm soory but Wikipedia requires me to try and solve disputes. But when it invloves talkingto people like you it';s not worth it.

--Jirate 13:42, 25 July 2005 (UTC)

He aint finished yet.

YOU (Thing2) have been booted from #wikipedia by DavidGerard (DavidGerard)

[INFO] You are banned from this channel.

--Jirate 13:57, 25 July 2005 (UTC)

Threats by Thersa Knott

I've manually unblocked the autoblocker block, as it's clear you were experimenting rather than trying to evade a block. The 24 hour block I put in place expires at 16.04 today. If you try to edit between now and then you'll trip the autoblocker again and reset the block for another 24 hours.

If you make any personal attacks when you return or start any malicious rfcs or rfars you will be blocked again. Theresa Knott (a tenth stroke) 14:29, 25 July 2005 (UTC)

You'll note that this is one of the people I want to put an RFC in against. For there block in the first place, now using there admin powers to protect themselves and threatening me. This is a clear case of abusing admin powers and will be reported ASAP.--Jirate 14:34, 25 July 2005 (UTC)

Further more your should unblock me and resign your adminship, you are not fit to be incharge of anything.--Jirate 14:35, 25 July 2005 (UTC)

For reference, this was the statement that triggered the one week personal attack ban. Snowspinner 15:34, July 25, 2005 (UTC)

Page protection

Your page has been protected for the remainder of your week ban, so as to make avoiding personal attacks that much easier. Snowspinner 14:50, July 25, 2005 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Charles Molyneux, 1st Earl of Sefton

The article Charles Molyneux, 1st Earl of Sefton has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article contains only a name and dates of birth & death. It is unreferenced. Article not further developed since its creation in early 2005.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kudpung (talk) 12:11, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Clodhopper (shoe) for deletion

The article Clodhopper (shoe) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clodhopper (shoe) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. WuhWuzDat 00:34, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Commissary

The article Commissary has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP is not a dictionary.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GeorgeLouis (talk) 16:10, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Category:Unarmed people shot by police

Category:Unarmed people shot by police, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 18:19, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Irate. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Irate~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

00:43, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

14:06, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Johnsons Cleaners UK

The article Johnsons Cleaners UK has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability, no reliable, independent sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 01:40, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Category:Knowsley has been nominated for discussion

Category:Knowsley, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Crouch, Swale (talk) 08:09, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Category:Sefton has been nominated for discussion

Category:Sefton, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Crouch, Swale (talk) 08:09, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kenny Murray

The article Kenny Murray has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

External links given list variously: a quoted statement from the subject regarding a festival, a brief directory entry, a link making no mention of the subject. Can find only passing mentions otherwise. No indication of satisfying WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mutt Lunker (talk) 09:59, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of North Corporation Primary School for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article North Corporation Primary School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North Corporation Primary School until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Imcdc (talk) 04:22, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of A5147 road

The article A5147 road has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chidgk1 (talk) 18:17, 23 May 2023 (UTC)