...adam's... user page

on Wikipedia, the free encyclopaedia with
6,914,574 articles that anyone can edit

This user talk page has been vandalised 14 times.

vn-14

Home • Talk ( Start a new conversation, e-mail me or view archive ) • Contributions ^(#)

Home

Talk

Sandbox

Stuff

My Pages

Re:

I understand your argument. However, at least on the link you provided, I don't see anything that says you can't imitate user interface or link off wikipedia. (Surely, you must not mean that one cannot make links to external sites because there are such links all over Wikipedia.) If you are talking about this: "The Wikipedia community generally frowns upon simulating the MediaWiki interface, and it should be avoided." then I fail to see how my joke simulates MediaWiki interface. Similar to what I did with Calton's like edit, I will wait three days for you to respond with a counter-argument, and then restore it. Thanks, Bagel7 09:23, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So, I looked through some of that discussion, and it looks like I can imitate the new messages box, as long as it doesn't link off of wikipedia. Correct? - Bagel7 14:57, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No I don't think you're being mean about this, but do you think I could leave my banner up per Kamikaze's user page? I understand you have an ongoing argument with him over this, but as long as he has the small arrow that shows that the user is going off of wikipedia, isn't it at least somewhat ok? Or at least are you going to revert it if I restore it like Kamikaze's? - Bagel7 05:00, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I cant.....

fine anything about Important Imports and Exports on Suriname —Preceding unsigned comment added by CountryGurl4321 (talk • contribs) 01:00, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hey —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.231.30.44 (talk) 02:01, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cool vandalised tag

In my talkpage, It's Raping Time vandalised 2 times see my user talk page. I added a tag. In that wiki, there is no way a user page can be vandalised, but a talk can be vandalised. Click here to see Click for my user page --116.14.183.192 (talk) 11:34, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]