Talk:Sudanese Air Force
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The stub is awkwardly written and without any facts of real substance. For example “Best and most well equipped Air Force in Eastern Africa.” Furthermore what’s with the msg box at the end that doesn’t seem connected with the content of the stub. Lukeisham 07:41, 17 Apr 2004 (UTC)
I checked other air force pages and this one is not up to standard. So I've gone ahead and for better or for worse made some drastic changes. Check the history of this page and you'll see what I mean. +Lukeisham
Factual Errors
[edit]There should be a very through editing of the table. The text for the number of MIG 29s contradicts the table by a factor of ten. The Sudanese Air Force has about 50 aircraft of unknown airworthiness and about 3-5K personnel. The numbers given at the table are grossly inaccurate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.12.203.109 (talk) 11:38, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Too many airplanes!
[edit]Sudan Air Force cannot have so many airplane written in this wiki page, e.g., 120 of Hongdu JL-8. The personnel of Sudan Air Force is only 3,000! I think the Russian wiki page may be nearer the fact. (ligand talk)5:58 20 October 2011(UTC)
Antonovs
[edit]Almost every reporter in Sudan now talks about Antonovs being used as bombers to the point where the term is more common than "bomber." If someone could cite the latest New Yorker, it has an article which explains in greater detail how these planes are used (bombs are purportedly dumped from the cargo bay without any mechanical or aiming assistance).--174.63.82.202 (talk) 22:37, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page
[edit]Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
- http://www.airforce-technology.com/projects/shenyangj6-f6fighter/
- Triggered by
\bairforce-technology\.com\b
on the local blacklist
- Triggered by
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 13:08, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 19:43, 9 April 2014 (UTC)