User talk:Drcontr
Greetings :-). Finally someone who can take care of all those gaping holes in the economy section of this site. All of them, you hear me? ;-) DrZ
- That's quite a challenge. Although the economics section is not as bad as the accounting section. Good to have another business/economics specialist on board. There are some links on my homepage that you might find useful.mydogategodshat 04:41, 29 Feb 2004 (UTC)
Germans
[edit]I've for long (a year, actually) been itched by the way Wikipedia-links are done with often sloppy distinctions between nationality, citizenship and ethnicity (with regard to persons) and also between nations and countries. This is particularly obvious in the case of people or entities that are denoted as German. A link to the Federal Republic of Germany is often outright unhistorical and wrong, but this has until now been the most usual.
Therefore I'm considering an article on Germans, which I've started at User:Ruhrjung/Germans. I would wish to avoid lots of edit wars. In particular, I would not wish to see the current disputes over German-Polish matters automatically extend also to this article, why I kindly ask you for comments now, in advance, in order to try to find wordings acceptable to as many as possible of concerned wikipedians.
I look forward to your comments at User talk:Ruhrjung/Germans.
--Ruhrjung 23:38, 14 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Germany is being replaced by a category
[edit]Hello! You were listed on the Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Germany page as living in or being associated with Germany. As part of the Wikipedia:User categorisation project, these lists are being replaced with user categories. If you would like to add yourself to the category that is replacing the page, or one of the Bundesland-based subcategories, please visit Category:Wikipedians in Germany for instructions. --Angr (tɔk) 14:51, 15 January 2006 (UTC)