Talk:Alexandria

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Alexandria article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 90 days

Cities: Core / Regional capitals

	Cities portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles
	This article is on the project's core list.
	This article is supported by the project's regional capital taskforce.

Egypt Top‑importance

	Egypt portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egypt on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject EgyptTemplate:WikiProject EgyptEgypt articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ancient Egypt Top‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egyptological subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient EgyptTemplate:WikiProject Ancient EgyptAncient Egypt articles

Top

This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Ancient Egypt to-do list:

Needed articles.

We should have an article on every pyramid and every nome in Ancient Egypt. I'm sure the rest of us can think of other articles we should have.

Cleanup.

To start with, most of the general history articles badly need attention. And I'm told that at least some of the dynasty articles need work. Any other candidates?

Standardize the Chronology.

A boring task, but the benefit of doing it is that you can set the dates !(e.g., why say Khufu lived 2589-2566? As long as you keep the length of his reign correct, or cite a respected source, you can date it 2590-2567 or 2585-2563)

Stub sorting

Anyone? I consider this probably the most unimportant of tasks on Wikipedia, but if you believe it needs to be done . . .

Data sorting.

This is a project I'd like to take on some day, & could be applied to more of Wikipedia than just Ancient Egypt. Take one of the standard authorities of history or culture -- Herotodus, the Elder Pliny, the writings of Breasted or Kenneth Kitchen, & see if you can't smoothly merge quotations or information into relevant articles. Probably a good exercise for someone who owns one of those impressive texts, yet can't get access to a research library.

Classical Greece and Rome Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Oriental Orthodoxy Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oriental Orthodoxy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on the Oriental Orthodox Church on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Oriental OrthodoxyWikipedia:WikiProject Oriental OrthodoxyTemplate:WikiProject Oriental OrthodoxyOriental Orthodoxy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christianity Mid‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Greece: Byzantine Low‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greek history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Byzantine world task force.

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

On 12 October 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved to Alexandria, Egypt. The result of the discussion was not moved.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Representative Concentration Pathway#4.5|Representative Concentration Pathway 4.5]]
[[Share taxi#Mashrū'|mashrū']]

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Some things to think about

History to present day.

Think the Egyptian Revolution, Suez Crisis (i.e. when did the British leave?) Dunc_Harris|☺ 11:19, 4 Oct 2004 (UTC)

missing some centuries ...

Surely interested editors can fill in the history from the tidal wave of the fourth century to the seventh century? 104.169.37.99 (talk) 17:31, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The version you are referring to likely has changed, but yes I would agree that there are 2 major gaps in the history section: one between the destructive earthquake of Alexandria and its fall to the Sassanid Empire and one between the construction of the governor's palace and the battle where the Ottomans annexed Egypt. Adrian Velazquez 2003 (talk) 14:48, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

General Ideas for Improving the article

Overall, many strides can be made to significantly improve the citation practices of this article. There are entire sections and subsections without any citations. With regards to the initial summary, the information about Alexander's body being moved to Egypt is unecessary and should be removed. There are also major gaps within the history section that I commented on in a reply, and several subheadings like Christianity which can arguable be moved under the history heading. One thing this article does well is providing a lot of images. Adrian Velazquez 2003 (talk) 14:52, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Analyzation of the inordinate amount of themes and sections

The article attempts to highlight too many aspects of Alexandria and has produced an overflow of information on subjects that only scrape the surface of Alexandria. Various lists within the article can arguably be shortened. The overproduction of train stations and routes makes the article seem like it is produced as a travel site not an informative article on Alexandria. Also, in the section on Education, and specifically within the "schools" subsection, there seems to be biased as the author seems to be ranking the schools based on which language is spoken, not the studies learned within. The subsection below "women" is clearly unfinished and does not do the proper justice to the development of women's studies within Alexandria. Furthermore, the section on Education does not mention the historical importance of education in Alexandria and how it has developed. Overall, the article tends to focus on various lists of entities within Alexandria and fails to explain their significance and contribution to Alexandria's uniquity.Ashg1177 (talk) 00:15, 4 April 2023 (UTC)Ashleyg1177Ashg1177 (talk) 00:15, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think in general you're right. I would add to that: one of the main problems is that even though the article is very long, there are large stretches of the article which are unsourced or very poorly sourced. When editors actually make the effort to cite reliable sources, they're also more likely to stick to what's important. Instead, some of this content seems like someone just wrote about their own personal experience in the city (e.g. like the discussion about tram fares), which is WP:OR and not what Wikipedia is for. I'm inclined to remove a lot of this unsourced trivia throughout, and maybe clean up some of the other awkward subsections.

The other suggestion that comes to mind is that there should eventually be a separate article about ancient Alexandria on its own, which can give proper focus to that rather large topic. History of Alexandria might be a place for some of that material. I also see that Not-A-Kitty has started a draft for Ptolemaic Alexandria, which could also absorb some of that topic. Of course, any other articles must still be carefully sourced, per WP:VERIFIABILITY. R Prazeres (talk) 23:45, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to AirshipJungleman29's recent removals, I've just removed more redundant or poor-quality sections, cleaned up some things, and added maintenance templates and inline tags for much of the remaining unsourced (but relevant) content.

There's one more layout issue I recommend dealing with: the infobox contains too many images, in my opinion, and all the images in the history section suffer from WP:STACKING (images in "Ancient era" section are pushed down to "Islamic era" section, images in "Islamic era" section are pushed down into Geography section, etc). I would recommend picking the images that are the most informative in these areas and removing the rest, which should at least help. R Prazeres (talk) 15:03, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Following up on my earlier comment above: I've reduced the number of images in the infobox from 10 to 6; the most I've seen in high-quality (GA or FA) city articles is 8, and many articles have less. Feel free to revise the selection itself, but please keep it to small number.

I've also trimmed some of the less useful images in and around the history section to reduce the stacking problem. Generally speaking, images that illustrate the city itself should be more pertinent here than artistic interpretations of people or events that have their own articles elsewhere. R Prazeres (talk) 05:16, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Humanities 2 1400-present

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 16 January 2024 and 7 May 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Qaddoumio1 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Issai920 (talk) 22:54, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]