Talk:Bombyx mori

Lepidoptera High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lepidoptera, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of butterflies and moths on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LepidopteraWikipedia:WikiProject LepidopteraTemplate:WikiProject LepidopteraLepidoptera articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and drink Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

China High‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Neri Oxman#Silk Pavilion|silk pavilion]] The anchor (#Silk Pavilion) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Old talk

The artical says nothing about eating the silkworms. All I know about it is its distinct flavor(you either love it or hate it) and its full of protien. Is there anyone out there who knows enough about the nutrients of eating the silkworm?

Who actually eats it? I've beening living in northern China for more than two decades and never heard of anyone eating the silkworms. I'm sure there are people who do this, but that's very rare. It's like adding eating the dragonflies or simply flies to their respective pages.--Wooddoo-eng 06:12, 18 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The Koreans sure do, you see vendors all over the place and I just tried one at dinner. But they eat only silkworm larvae/pupae, not the worms per se. Jpatokal 12:04, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Blogger story[1] about eating Korean canned silkworm pupae. Cy Guy 07:12, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Silkworm pupae are important as food in parts of southeast Asia and tribal regions of India. They are eaten as a significant source of protein in parts of Korea, Laos, Thailand, etc. http://www.wormspit.com/wormfoods.htm Canned or frozen silkworms are often available at Oriental grocery stores. Oakenking 14:24, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Taxonomy

bombyx mori has no subspecies. silkworm is not a scientific name. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.242.105.47 (talk) 06:46, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

silk worm in pecan tree

All the articles I have read while researching silk worms on the internet say they are found in mulberry trees. Do they survive on other trees? I had a landscaper come by to discuss planting of some shade trees and he said that the "nests" in my pecan tree were from silk worms. We have a small wooded area along two sides of our property and I don't see any of these "nests" in them, only in our pecan trees. Are they harmful to my pecan tree? After reading this article and their rate of reproduction I would suspect the answer to be yes. Is there anything that can be done to discourage they growth, other than, of course, distroying the nests?

I would expect they are more likely some variety of tent caterpiller. Call your local cooperative extension service office to find out what they think. Cy Guy 07:12, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Silkworm Disease

Silkworm Disease( Virus, Bacteria, fungus, Nosema...).You and your friend can help me to write and expanding it ? i need infomation but i is not good English !--203.160.1.43 11:00, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

What is the lifespan of a silkworm? Perhaps we could add a map showing it's geographic range?

The silkworm, Bombyx mori, is fully domesticated. It has been raised in nearly every part of the world which will support its food plants. Oakenking 14:29, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This artical has some good information, but it reads like a how to book. Unfortunatly my writing skills are not at a level to fix this. Hopefully someone will notice this and reword it.

Changing the image?

The article is about the domestic silkworm, Bombyx mori, but the image on the side is an entirely different species, Callosamia promethea. I don't know how to change the image, but would be happy to donate one of my photographs from http://www.wormspit.com. Oakenking 14:27, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Range

I took out the reference to occurrence in Persia/Iran, because I could not find confirmation. THe likely natural range (before domestivcation) was that of B. mandarina and ended at northern India. Satyrium 02:27, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Biology

This article presents information from a very utilitarian point of view and does not address the biology of the organism in good detail. It lacks information about the physiological and behavioral aspects of the adult moth. Shreenidhipm (talk) 01:39, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

sorry

This tells nothing about silkworms. How many eggs do they lay? (found nothing) How often do farmers feed them? What do silkworms eat? (found nothing) How many days does it take to spin a cocoon? Put more info on your page, then it will be great!!!!!!!!!!

Silk-moths lay up to 500 eggs[what a big breakfast!] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lol o fat bat (talk • contribs) 21:12, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

7 years and still nothing about a silkworm's life cycle and physiology. For a high-importance article on 2 wikiprojects, this is highly disappointing.

I'd like to know things such as how long it takes for a larva to reach full size, pupate etc., when they start to mate, how often do they mate and how soon they lay eggs, and like OP first mentioned, how many eggs they lay on average. 184.254.13.250 (talk) 08:35, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article suggests "Adult Bombycidae have reduced mouthparts and do not feed, though a human caretaker can feed them.", however I can find no evidence that this is true. Either they have the structures necessary for ingesting and digesting or they don't. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:646:8300:3A8:A4A9:DFE1:5170:737F (talk) 23:49, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good point. That seems unlikely to have a reliable source, so rather than asking for a citation, I'll just delete it. Dyanega (talk) 15:51, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Do silkworms really look like ants?

In the section "Silkworm disease" occurs the line:

But it is easy to confuse young, tiny silkworms with ants, as they look somewhat alike

This doesn't seem right to me. Pictures I've seen of silkworms (for example on http://www.wormspit.com) look like caterpillars, not ants. Is there a species of silkworm that does look like an ant? Tocharianne 14:57, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The hatchlings really do look like ants - but only at arm's length. I think it's the horde of tiny bobbing shiny heads. I wouldn't say it's "easy to confuse" them - but if you have several hundred hatch at once, they definitely look like the surface of a disturbed ant hill. Oakenking 20:12, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The title of this article should be Silkworm

This article is about an insect that most English speakers would only know of as the "Silkworm." The title of this article should be "Silkworm" or "Silkworm (insect)."

Here is the relevant Wikipedia policy: "Generally, article naming should prefer to what the majority of English speakers would most easily recognize, with a reasonable minimum of ambiguity, while at the same time making linking to those articles easy and second nature.

"This is justified by the following principle: Names of Wikipedia articles should be optimized for readers over editors; and for a general audience over specialists.

-anon —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.70.91.59 (talk) 00:34, 14 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

wrong citations?

This article uses parenthetical citations instead of footnotes. Rugz 18:54, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Size

I notice the size of silkworms isn't mentioned anywhere. Could someone provide this? --Wafulz 15:15, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Units

Some of the article is converted in metric units. could someone convert the remainder? Goldfinger820 08:31, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MORE

MORE STUFF ON SILKWORM PLEASE!

Lol o fat bat (talk) 20:12, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agenda Pushing?

Perhaps the last part of this line is a bit specious "no longer occurs in the wild if it ever did so". Wouldn’t silkworms have existed in the wild at least at some point in their evolutionary history? Not an expert on this, so I didn’t change it. God, I love being a pedantic insomniac. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Le Gibbon (talk • contribs) 04:16, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

yep i agree - sounds dogdy Goldfinger820 04:54, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bombyx mori is a domesticated animal - like dogs, chickens, or cows. It was almost certainly bred from a wild species called Bombyx mandarina. Mandarina still exists in the wild, and mori can be bred back to the wild stock. Some sources seem to imply that there USED to be wild Bombyx mori, and that they're all extinct... but that's not my understanding. User: Oakenking 2:54 29 May 2008 (CDT) —Preceding comment was added at 19:55, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 02:17, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tone of introduction

I'm not an expert on silkworms, so I haven't made any changes, but here are a few issues. The introduction has some statements that are not cited and have the feel of someone pushing a research agenda: the sentence beginning " Molecular clock studies suggesting an age of many millions of years[citation needed] cannot be taken seriously" and the beginning of the next paragraph, "This is not correct however due to the domestication process having accelerated the pace of evolution." At the very least, these statements need citations, but would be much better with a more neutral tone: "although molecular clock studies have estimated the time of divergence at XXX, the accuracy of these studies is unknown because they assume that both species have evolved at a constant rate, an assumption which has been subject to frequent criticism." Citations to the literature are then needed. More fundamentally, I'm not sure why these sections are included in the introduction. They're relatively specific, and could be confined to a subsection of the document. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.245.223.242 (talk) 21:24, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wild hybrids

First paragraph in the lead says:

It is entirely dependent on humans for its reproduction and no longer occurs naturally in the wild

Second one says:

The domesticated and wild species can still breed and so hybridize together.

This is beyond my knowledge, so I can't edit, but I don't see how a domesticated species can breed with one that doesn't occur in the wild.

--- OtherDave (talk) 14:10, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OtherDave, it is B. mandarina that is the (still widespread) wild species, and B. mori that is a domesticated species, which no longer occurs in the wild. The two can hybridise. I have reworded the paragraph. I hope this clarifies it. MFdeS (talk) 07:18, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Foodstuffs: B. mori does not feed on Ailanthus.

The first paragraph states that "A silkworm's preferred food is white mulberry leaves, but it may also eat the leaves of the Osage Orange or the Tree of Heaven", with "Tree of Heaven" linking to Ailanthus altissima. I think this is a case of mistaken identity. The larva of the Samia cynthia silkmoth does indeed feed on Tree of Heaven, but not Bombix mori, which is the subject of this article. Unless somebody can come up with a reference for B. mori eating Ailanthus, this should be deleted. MFdeS (talk) 07:13, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the reference to Ailanthus. MFdeS (talk) 13:45, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Domestication

In the article, domestication is listed as happening in the Han Dynasty some 2000 years ago. Domestication of the silk worm takes place much earlier, during the Shang Dynasty approximately 3500 years ago. It was during the Han Dynasty that Chinese silk made its way to the West.

Source: East Asia: A Cultural, Social and Political History. Ebrey, Walthall, Palais. 2009. Page 52.

I'm new to this wikipedia thing. Not sure how to proceed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Palebluemote (talk • contribs) 06:02, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Diseases

Aren't the first and last diseases listed the same thing? If you go to the pebrine page, it lists the same exact description.--Dramartistic (talk) 21:36, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Entirely

The following sentence seems wrong: "It is entirely dependent on humans for its reproduction and does not occur naturally in the wild" Pass a Method talk 18:16, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Citation Needed on Butenandt (500,000 worms sentence in Research heading)

I believe the first couple lines in the introduction to this paper say that he isolated it from over 500,000 worms and 20 years.

Butenandt, Adolf, and E. Hecker. "Synthese des Bombykols, des Sexual‐Lockstoffes des Seidenspinners, und seiner geometrischen Isomeren." Angewandte Chemie 73.11 (1961): 349-353. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.207.92.30 (talk) 20:28, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Bombyx mori. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120314044223/http://www.silkwormeggs.net/resources/Silkworm-School-Science-Project-Instruction.pdf to http://www.silkwormeggs.net/resources/Silkworm-School-Science-Project-Instruction.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:49, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Bombyx mori/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

good amount of info. would benefit from small rewrites for clarity in some sections and a few more in-text citations Goldfinger820 22:41, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 22:41, 21 November 2006 (UTC). Substituted at 10:00, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bombyx mori. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:52, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confusion

Since "silkworm" redirects to this page, there could be potential confusion because several other species including the muga silkworm (Antheraea assamensis) are used in commercial silk production, and the family Saturniidae are known as giant silk moths. Also, the disambiguation page does not refer to these other "silkworms". Can an editor who is knowledgeable about site formatting policies please clarify this mess? 71.93.220.235 (talk) 02:23, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bombyx mori. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:12, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Silk worm behavior?

While this article is well written and fairly comprehensive, I think that much could be gained from a discussion of various behaviors that are largely ignored in this article. Discussions on the patterns of social organization or interactions, mating, kin structures, host plant, competitor and collaborator species if any would make for a much more robust page. Many Lepidoptera pages include these sorts of discussions and I think they should be extended to this species as well given its high importance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moid.ali (talk • contribs) 03:05, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bombyx mori. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://life.cqu.edu.cn/zezhang/silkwormDomest_Sci09-10-16.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110225234236/http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2009/01/13-02.html to http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2009/01/13-02.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060412215344/http://www.wormspit.com/index.htm to http://www.wormspit.com/index.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:01, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Definition (& Usage) of Mori

Mori is the Latin for "dead" or "death", so why is it that the English translation of "Bombyx Mori" would be, in this instance, "Silkworm of the Mulberry Tree"? This would actually translate to "Bombyx Argos Muraeius", "Bombyx Pirorum" or even "Bombyx Morus". (I know that "mori" is the genitive case, declensionally-speaking, of "morus" but still... It's tough to grok why such nomenclature was originally chosen).

Interestingly, "morus" can also mean "stupid" - from the same etymological roots (moron<>mulberry? "Oh you silly Mulberry..! :D ) zarathustra (talk) 00:44, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lunar Silkworm eggs

I have removed the section on the moon. The Chinese space program originally announced that it was going to send silk worm eggs to the moon onboard Chang'e-4, but ultimately it sent fruit fly eggs. To the best of my ability, it seems like lots of news sites misreported this detail about the biological experiment on Chang'e-4. I have looked through many articles that discusses the outcome of the experiments and none mention silk worms being onboard.

Here are two links that support my removal of the lunar section from the article...

https://qz.com/1523661/cotton-seeds-china-carried-to-the-moon-has-sprouted/ https://www.guancha.cn/industry-science/2018_12_10_482783.shtml

Equant (talk) 19:13, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

To add to article

To add to this article: the fact that this species does not exist in nature (outside of human communities). 173.88.246.138 (talk) 01:03, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

THis information was already in the article, just not properly emphasized, so I fixed that. Dyanega (talk) 01:16, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Antennae

Antennae:

The antennae of the male Bombyx mori are "...pectinate (comb-like) antennae [that] can detect as few as 3,000 molecules of female pheromone per millilitre of air..."^[1]

References

^ ANDREW RAMSEY; TERRY F. HOUSTON; ALEXANDER D. BALL; TOMASZ GORAL; MAXWELL V.L. BARCLAY; JONATHAN P.L. COX (16 June 2015). "Towards an Understanding of Molecule Capture by the Antennae of Male Beetles Belonging to the Genus Rhipicera (Coleoptera, Rhipiceridae)". The Anatomical Record Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology. 298 (9): 1519–1534. doi:10.1002/ar.23188. Archived from the original on 27 February 2022. Retrieved 27 February 2022.

Xyxyzyz (talk) 05:05, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Use common name

This is an article about a species of animal. Wikipedia articles use the common name of the animal, not the technical name. This should be moved to silkworm. Tysto (talk) 20:45, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Silkworm breeding - Crossbreeding to include silk production proteins from spiders

This is not correct, the cited article also clearly calls this transgenic and not crossbreeding. There is no chance to crossbreed a spider and an insect.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3271896/. The source describes that they used a Vector (piggyBAC) to introduce the genetic material from the spider. 90.77.114.141 (talk) 11:32, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Conservation status of Bombyx mori" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Conservation status of Bombyx mori has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 21 § Conservation status of Bombyx mori until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 16:08, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The numbers don't add up (# of cocoons needed to produce 1 pound of silk)

1 pound requires 2000-3000 cocoons The world produces 70 million pounds of silk yearly 70,000,000 × 2000 = 140,000,000,000 70,000,000 × 3000 = 210,000,000,000 140-210 billion cocoons. ===> This is the correct number assuming 2000-3000cocoons/pound is correct. The article says world yearly production requires 10 billion cocoons!احمد الليبي (talk) 19:18, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Silk moth" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Silk moth has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 6 § Silk moth until a consensus is reached. Jay 💬 06:02, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ANDREW RAMSEY; TERRY F. HOUSTON; ALEXANDER D. BALL; TOMASZ GORAL; MAXWELL V.L. BARCLAY; JONATHAN P.L. COX (16 June 2015). "Towards an Understanding of Molecule Capture by the Antennae of Male Beetles Belonging to the Genus Rhipicera (Coleoptera, Rhipiceridae)". The Anatomical Record Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology. 298 (9): 1519–1534. doi:10.1002/ar.23188. Archived from the original on 27 February 2022. Retrieved 27 February 2022.

[1]