User talk:TowerDragon

Hi there, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you ever need editing help visit Wikipedia:How does one edit a page or how to format them visit our manual of style. Experiment at Wikipedia:Sandbox. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Wikipedia:Naming conventions. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help or add a question to the Village pump or my talk page. Have fun! -- Schnee 13:01, 5 Sep 2003 (UTC)

Barnstar

Angelbo 17:48, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Random disambig

Sorry bout that, didn't know about the no piping on disambiguation pages (re: random (comics)) WookMuff 08:24, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wizard (fantasy)

Because you have made comments on the Wizard (fantasy) talk page, I thought you might be interested to know of a Request for Comments: Talk:Wizard (fantasy)#Request for comment Goldfritha 02:08, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Glad you chipped in on the RFC.

Meanwhile -- the other editor has created an article Magicians in fantasy. I would be happy to take the title, but this is in addition to the Wizard (fantasy) page. If you, like me, think one article suffices, you might want to comment on that as well. Goldfritha 00:20, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

One more time!

I hope.

You may find the "Proposal for resolution of concerns" worth chipping in on. Same article. Goldfritha 00:14, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If wishes were horses. . .

The page was merged to Magicians in fantasy. And then redirected, not to Magicians in fantasy, but to Wizard.

I thought you might be interested to know of a second Request for Comments on the page: Talk:Wizard (fantasy)#Request for comment 2 Goldfritha 03:19, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merger and redirect

Hi TowerDragon, just to let you know your opinion would be valued in both the merge proposal for Magicians in fantasy to Magician and the discussion on whether to delete or redirect the now-defunct Wizard (fantasy) article. Thanks! Dreadlocke ☥ 20:07, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Plot edits

Hey, I noticed you reverted my reversion to your edit :) Here was my reasoning: I try to avoid taking links from one disambig page (X) and putting them in another disambig page (Y). The reason is that it makes it hard to maintain. If another link gets added to X, then it may not get added to Y, or visa versa. For example, it makes a lot of sense to remove all the "Saint Pauls" from the page "Paul" and let the "Saint Paul" page do the disambiguation. I agree it's a bit different here, since we're linking to a synonym. I'm torn about what to do in this situation. - grubber 23:25, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied at User talk:Grubber#Re: Plot edits — TowerDragon 23:46, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just replied again too. - grubber 19:24, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of Arcanite (Warcraft)

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Arcanite (Warcraft), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Arcanite (Warcraft) is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Arcanite (Warcraft), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 09:02, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Germany Invitation

Hello, TowerDragon! I'd like to call your attention to the WikiProject Germany and the German-speaking Wikipedians' notice board. I hope their links, sub-projects and discussions are interesting and even helpful to you. If not, I hope that new ones will be.

--Zeitgespenst (talk) 07:46, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:84.143.110.28

Greetings! I was just wondering whether you still wanted to maintain this page. I'm of a mind to add a link to the IP edit history in question and move the page to a subpage of your userspace. Cheers! bd2412 T 13:14, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not quite sure what you have in mind. But it is highly improbable that I will ever use that IP address again and the listed changes seem pretty minor, so I don't really mind. As long as there is some not-too-obscure way to get at the information, just go ahead! TowerDragon (talk) 18:08, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, the page is now at User talk:TowerDragon/84.143.110.28; the first line is a link to the contribution history of the IP address, which is solely comprised of those four edits. I have been working on the backlog of ancient IP talk page notices, and just happened to come across that one. Cheers! bd2412 T 18:21, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion

Notice to significant contributors to the articles that a Merge Proposal from Alp (folklore) --> Mare (folklore) is underway. Your feedback is welcomed at Talk:Mare (folklore) --Kiyoweap (talk) 06:18, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of language bindings for Qt 4, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Qt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, TowerDragon. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, TowerDragon. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, TowerDragon. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]