Jump to content

Talk:New Mexico

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeNew Mexico was a Geography and places good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 14, 2010Good article nomineeNot listed
June 13, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
Current status: Former good article nominee

Please see new "Other" item at end

[edit]

Hey folks ... NM native and Wikipedia newbie here. For anyone watching this page, please see the "Other" item that I added at the end of the article. I think it's relevant albeit amusing, but I'm open to discussing it. The geographic ignorance of NM isn't all that common these days, but I think it happens often enough to merit a mention. Thanks. Yesthatbruce (talk) 04:04, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's a worthy inclusion and have long enjoyed that segment! But the paragraph you added makes a number of claims ("Since 1970...", "...only state to do this...", "...so as not to be confused...") that should be cited. WP:CITE has some tips on what constitutes a good citation by Wiki standards, but mostly it should be independent (i.e. not written by the magazine itself) and reliable (i.e. not some crazy geocities site).
Thanks for contributing and keep up! SpookyTwenty (talk) 18:02, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

agriculture economic numbers

[edit]

In the agriculture and food production section, the article says NM has an agricultural sector worth $40 billion annually. This would be >40% of the entire state economy. By comparison, the actual USA agricultural production is worth ~$380 billion/year (USDA figures), which is 1.4% of the economy. The $40 billion number is overstated by at least an order of magnitude. 2601:58A:887F:5E80:FCC6:64E5:9207:4D81 (talk) 20:12, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, multiple sources contradict that $40B number:
https://www.ibisworld.com/united-states/economic-profiles/new-mexico/
https://www.statista.com/statistics/1065130/new-mexico-real-gdp-by-industry/
https://web.archive.org/web/20240114193756/https://www.dws.state.nm.us/Portals/0/DM/LMI/NM_Data_Focus_GDP.pdf
https://web.archive.org/web/20230515113308/https://www.dws.state.nm.us/Portals/0/Gross_Domestic_Product_of_New_Mexico.pdf
They all put agriculture+forestry+fishing+hunting at less than $2B.
- Wikkiwonkk (talk) 15:04, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

too long tag

[edit]

#Culture is the longest section, perhaps it should be moved back to culture of New Mexico? Arlo James Barnes 16:19, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've posted a message to the Tea Room to ask how to go about editing the page so that it's consistent with other state pages.

Total page word count (minus footnotes) is ~21,000 words by copying and pasting the text into Word, using the Unformatted Text paste option. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gamboler (talkcontribs) 02:43, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Economic climate" claim is unverified

[edit]

In the third paragraph (starts with "New Mexico's economy") it says that NM has a significant military presence "due to its large area and economic climate". First problem: "economic climate" is a vague term. Second problem: the cited source says nothing about New Mexico's economy being the reason for the significant military presence. Just the opposite (sort of) - it says that the significant military presence plays a key role in the state's economy. Perhaps the editor who wrote "economic climate" meant to say something about NM's climate (lots of clear sunny days? I don't know), but the source doesn't say anything about that either. - Wikkiwonkk (talk) 15:48, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

flag shouldnt be CC0 licensed

[edit]

the flag should be in the public domain, not under the CC0 license. 73.216.182.68 (talk) 19:00, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]