User talk:Daniel Brockman

Thanks, and keep contributing... Dysprosia 05:14, 7 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Hey Daniel, about WUSC...it's perfect (alright, so one parenthesis wasn't closed. That was probably me). If it wasn't five in the morning when I wrote it, I probably would've done it that way. And thanks for the props. --Billfred 00:54, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Timeline of unfulfilled Christian Prophecy

I have noticed your interest in this article. I would like to encourage you to cast a vote for the alternative names that are currently being proposed. Thanks for your help on this matter --T-rex 04:15, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The voteing for renaming this article has gone into a second round. I would like to ask you to continue to vote and stay involved in the discussion. Thanks --T-rex 22:51, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The final round of voting is in progress. Your opinion would be welcome. Best, Tex 00:08, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Generation X: Tales For An Accelerated Culture

There was no need to move Generation X: Tales For An Accelerated Culture. The name appears on the book that way. -- LGagnon 17:34, 18 Jun 2004 (UTC)

That is a formatting decision made by the cover designer. Do you suggest we should also try to imitate the typeface and color used on the book cover? — Daniel Brockman 17:50, Jun 18, 2004 (UTC)

Typewriter vs. typographic punctuation

I noticed that you recently changed the punctuation for Sigur Rós and one of their potential albums. The problem is that the change you did was to change the apostrophes and quotation marks into their typographic versions. This appear to be in conflict with Manual of Style. Do you mind changing it back? Sebras (talk)

Thanks, I was wondering what the policy on that was nowadays, so I figured I’ll just try to change it somewhere and see if anybody complains. :-) I’ll put it back. P.S. Is it customary to reply like I’m doing right now or should I reply on your talk page? —Daniel Brockman (talk)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:46, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Daniel Brockman.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Daniel Brockman.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 20:53, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]